Affordable Care Act

Affordable Care Act2 posts
Are you a superfan? Join Newslines now and help us create cool news timelines about your favorite people and teams. Register now!
Jun 2015

Upholds health care subsidies


In a 6-3 ruling, justices uphold health care subsidies, based on their finding that critics’ reading of Obamacare might make sense in isolation, but not when viewed in a larger context and in light of the intention of the law. Americans who currently receive subsidies under the Affordable Care Act will continue to do so.  Chief Justice Roberts writes for the majority:

Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them. If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter.

He is joined by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, Kennedy and Sotomayor. Justice Scalia presents the dissent, and is joined by Justices Alito and Thomas. Scalia calls the decision “wonderfully convenient,” complains about “interpretative jiggery-pokery” and argues it was not the Court’s job to make up for the sloppy drafting of the law by Congress, branding the law as “SCOTUScare”.

Newslines lets you create cool news timelines about your favorite people and products. Register now!
  • Contributors
  • Network
Contributions Percentage
Sharon 2.00 100%
Contributions Percentage